Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:02:10 -0500 (EST) From: mphorn22 Subject: It only looks that way. Tom, it sounds like you don’t know how activism works. There seldom are large numbers who actually get involved in committees, legwork, etc. The prevailing “hue and cry” I’ve heard from churches, political organizations,Continue Reading
Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2014 08:30:05 -0500 From: momopom Subject: reply to Mr. West Mr. West, your post about Jane Forbes was unfair. By taking her comment out of context you made her sound like an awful snob. I don’t know Jane, but your post made me curious, so IContinue Reading
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 15:08:20 +0000 From: Tom West Subject: Is Jane Forbes the smartest person in Chatham County? Former Chatham Coalition Commissioner George Lucier better watch out. Looks like someone is looking to replace him as the “smartest person in Chatham County.” Found this proclamation by PittsboroMatters’ memberContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 10:22:39 -0800 (PST) From: Barbara Jones Subject: Who is Taylor Kish Who ia bwhind the Taylor Kish Series of slanderous, slash attacks on people who question the Chatham Park rezoning request? In a post appearing in the December 28th Chatlist edition, Mr. Brad Page statesContinue Reading
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 10:57:25 -0500 (EST) From: Jane Forbes Subject: re: God Save the Land Section D in the News and Observer, December 29, has a wonderful article about the relationship between use of the land, caring for the land, and human responsibility for abuse of the land. Continue Reading
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:18:30 -0500 From: Taylor Kish Subject: Dr. Dykers, stupid behavior, and Henny Penny Dr. Dykers, I agree with your post in the Chatlist (1/3 #4829) 100%. I can’t think of any post you offered that was not well thought out, balanced, and fair even withoutContinue Reading
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 21:37:50 -0500 From: Tom West Subject: Pittsboro Matters doesn’t have the numbers or the public support While Brad Page claims that a few hundred belong to Pittsboro Matters, The truth is that number of active members actually less than 100. As many of us know,Continue Reading
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:45:57 -0500 From: John Alderman Subject: CPI’s Business Model Chatham Park Investors, LLC’s business model is extremely dangerous (emphasis added) for all farmers, ranchers, and woodland owners in North Carolina. Their model: Replace traditional land uses by leapfrogging extremely large, high density developments into ruralContinue Reading
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 21:56:25 -0500 (EST) From: Brad Page Subject: Re: Chatham Chatlist – Taylor Kish and Tom West I see Tom West of Pittsboro and Taylor Kish of Nowhere are on a tear with the usual personal or ad hominum attacks. Fine with me – keep itContinue Reading
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 12:08:19 -0500 From: chathammatters Subject: Control vs Freedom Momopom wrote that: “Webster’s definition of suburban: uninteresting, conventional, ordinary, commonplace, unremarkable, unexceptional…†It didn’t match what I remembered of the term, so I looked it up in several dictionaries: here are the actual definitions of suburbanContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 23:21:40 -0500 From: chathammatters Subject: Pittsboro Matters/Chatham Coalition is very far left wing Karen Crowell, In the past you’ve said that I was a “business woman”. Why you said it I can’t possibly say, I most certainly am not a business woman. Now you’ve saidContinue Reading
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:02:46 -0500 From: Taylor Kish Subject: John Alderman’s well stated target Back on Nov. 5 I reserved judgement on John Alderman’s post #4793 because he sounded interesting and knowledgeable. John Alderman never informed us via this Chatlist he was paid by the Rocky River HeritageContinue Reading
Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2014 21:49:18 -0500 From: Karen Crowell Subject: job security? lunatic fringe? Funny, isn’t it, that “chathamatters” defends the need to remain anonymous for “job security”. In other words, your views are so unpopular you might lose your jobs? That just doesn’t make sense. Aren’t you speakingContinue Reading
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 15:02:02 -0500 (EST) From: Maryphyllis Subject: re Pittsboro Matters & Bella Donna Re PITTSBORO MATTERS – In Chatham Chatlist #4871 Kim commented on the polarization that many of the posts about Chatham Park have taken. I agree! One of those is the attitude toward PittsboroContinue Reading
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 23:17:10 -0500 From: Lyle Estill Subject: What I Have Learned from the Chatlist…. Tonight I was relieved to learn that Tom Glendenning feels the Chatlist is a viable place to share our opinions. That was a relief to me, since I was uptight about Cryptic’sContinue Reading
Chatham Chatlist ©2024