Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 06:28:51 -0500 From: Gene Galin Subject: Preston’s developer thinks bigger, proposes new 22,000 home city in Chatham County From the News & Observer – *Preston’s developer thinks bigger, proposes new 22,000 home city in Chatham County* Chatham Park is the brainchild of Tim Smith, oneContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 21:59:32 -0500 From: Taylor Kish Subject: Ok, I will aim for fairness. . . To be fair, I accept some of those who have signed on with PittsboroMatters feel like they are being Paul(Paulette) Revere; alerting Chatlist Chathamites to the dangers of Preston Development andContinue Reading
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:59:54 -0500 From: Pittsboro Matters Subject: Chatham Park Construction Jobs? How many jobs and contracts will be set aside for local residents and businesses during the Chatham Park construction process? Unless Chatham Park Investors (AKA Tim Smith and Bubba Rawls) provides a binding answer toContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:28:45 -0500 From: “Tom Glendinning” Subject: Another Chatham Park Comment – a matter of principle I think we should issue Parking tickets for those who rehash the same arguments. But in the words of our iconic folk hero, Pete Seegar, “This Land Is Your Land.”Continue Reading
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:14:44 -0500 From: “Tom Glendinning” Subject: Chatham Park Observations Simple and in outline form: 1. The census department forecasts that the population of the county will grow by more than 55,000 to 60,000 people in the next 30 years. If these families buy individual lotsContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:21:33 -0500 From: “John R Dykers” Subject: John Alderman’s Post re Chatham Park. It sounds as though Mr. Alderman, “a professional in this area” should have a face-to-face meeting with Mr. Goodnight and evaluate the plans for Chatham Park with him. He could then tellContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 21:53:53 -0500 From: samantha capitol Subject: Keep it in PBO I have been surfing around the internet and found this face book site called “Keep it in PBO”. Interesting site: https://www.facebook.com/keepitinpbo/posts/1388349031424670?comment_id=20223¬if_t=like I also have followed the HD 54 replacement. It looks like Voller’s friend StarkweatherContinue Reading
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 16:19:19 -0500 From: “connectnc.net Subject: to park or not to park I have kept mostly quiet about the Chatham park issue . Its clear there are strong arguments on both sides . My question is why build 20,000 homes when we have unfinished developments withContinue Reading
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:52:13 -0500 From: “John R Dykers” Subject: Chatham Park Construction Jobs? Pittsboro Matters raises legitimate concerns. Contracts will be let by “Chatham Park Investors (AKA Tim Smith and Bubba Rawls)” based on the vendors capacity to perform the service, personal relationships/knowledge of prior performance, andContinue Reading
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 17:43:09 -0500 From: samantha capitol Subject: Chatham Park, 2 good things about it 1- The owners are North Carolina Developers They live among us and know what the traditions and tolerances are here. They are not from somewhere else. 2- The land is paid forContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:57:36 -0500 From: Taylor Kish Subject: =?windows-1252?Q?Brad_Page_=96_You_should_know_better=2E?= “The ignorant mind, with its infinite afflictions, passions, and evils, is rooted in the three poisons. Greed, anger, and delusion.” Preston Development does not have to inform you of exactly what kind of nails they will use, 4”Continue Reading
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:25:41 -0600 From: Randolph Voller Subject: Answers for the good questions from Mary Phyllis Horn: Dear Mary Phyllis: I have chatted with you for years, exchanged emails and either read or listened intently to your wisdom and concerns. And you are one of the manyContinue Reading
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:07:04 -0500 From: Randolph Voller Subject: Water/Fracking/Concerns The Town of Pittsboro took a leadership role in March of 2012 to take a stand regarding “fracking” and subsequently amended its zoning ordinance to require a special use permit (which requires a quasi-judicial hearing) for any suchContinue Reading
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:45:13 -0500 From: samantha capitol Subject: Pittsboro matters to all of us. I apologize for my long winded presentation regarding Chatham Park. But the rezoning process and its implications are too complicated to reduce to haiku. Although heavy handed, my point is this: the leadershipContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:53:55 -0500 (EST) From: Brad Page Subject: Chatham Park: After PDD approval A reply to Samantha Capitol: “PittsboroMatters leadership: “neutral,” dishonest, or misguided?” Though her somewhat long post goes into considerable detail on the Chatham Park development she leaves one glaring point unaddressed: Why cannotContinue Reading
Chatham Chatlist ©2024