Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 22:29:36 -0400 (GMT-04:00) From: Subject: Chatham Park All, Make no mistake, Chatham Parks is all about profits and like every other development throughout the country, the tax payers foot the bill for them to make these profits!!!! Let’s start with the impact fees….. The realContinue Reading

Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 18:17:00 -0400 From: Taylor Kish Subject: The Biltmore Estate is about 8,000 acres. . . Would neighbors “ALLOW”  George Vanderbilt to create the Biltmore Estate today?  What about the Global Transpark’s 2500 acres?  Do any of you think you are more qualified to improve aContinue Reading

Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 08:52:50 -0400 From: momopom Subject: Will new development bring jobs? I don’t know, statistically, how much communities really benefit when there is new development. I was quite surprised when “interviewing” employees at the various businesses at the 15-501/64 intersection when it was first developed thatContinue Reading

Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 15:50:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Brad Page Subject: Fwd: birth control/Chatham Park; ecology/development in Chatham County —– Forwarded Message —– From: “John R Dykers” To: “Brad Page” Cc: “chatlist” Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2013 1:47:39 PM Subject: birth control/Chatham Park; ecology/development in Chatham County  T’ain’t easy.Continue Reading

Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 01:31:54 -0400 (EDT) From: mphorn22 Subject: Ounce of Prevention re Chatham Park? Ounce of Prevention re Chatham Park? Developers from Cary have proposed a huge development project between Pittsboro proper and Jordan Lake.  It encompasses 7001 acres and plans to increase our population from ourContinue Reading

Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 08:08:38 -0400 From: Amanda Robertson Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Chatham_Park_SOS:_Act_NOW,_before_it=E2=80=99s_too_lat?==?utf-8?Q?e?= Dear Friends, Despite receiving hundreds of your signatures on our petition asking the Pittsboro Town Board  to slow down and keep the Chatham Park review process open, bring in outside experts, and seek your input, our elected officialsContinue Reading

Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 23:22:24 -0400 From: Lyle Estill Subject: Cautionary post I have to say that John Alderman’s cautionary post makes a lot of sense. It makes me wonder.  Here we are discussing tethering options for Grand Daddy Longlegs, when there is a proposal in front of usContinue Reading

Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 13:41:23 -0400 From: “John R Dykers” Subject: Coming development – John Alderman’s post Realistic concerns. WE People are always a tradeoff between being consumers of resources and being a resource ourselves. As a biologist, I am sure John Aldeman sees humans as a part ofContinue Reading