Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 18:46:04 -0400 From: “Andrew George” Subject: RE: your posts critique of ‘Cryptic’s facts’ dated 12 june and posted 14 june Actually,  Old growth and mature forests sequester more carbon than spindly little genetically modified pine-plantation crops.  See below w/re NATURE Magazine articles about carbon.   And,Continue Reading

Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2014 08:57:16 -0400 From: cryptik Subject: Fisking the environmental “experts” Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 10:53:01 -0400 From: “Andrew George” Subject: Crypic’s “facts” >Since “Cryptic” seems interested in getting to the truth, please consider these facts: >Cryptic writes: “What if you discover that humans clearing outContinue Reading

Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2014 15:18:39 -0400 From: Catherine Deininger Subject: Online Survey of Pittsboro Community Conservation Priorities The Chatham Conservation Partnership invites you to assist us with ranking the conservation priorities of the Pittsboro community.  Your responses to this survey will provide a framework to rank potential conservation areasContinue Reading

Links to stories about Chatham Park approval by Pittsboro Commissioners

Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:18:01 -0400 From: Gene Galin Subject: Chatham Park approved by Pittsboro Commissioners. 4-1 Chatham Park approved by Pittsboro Town Commissioners on Monday evening by a 4-1 vote. Pittsboro Commissioners Pamela Baldwin, Michael Fiocco, Jay Farrell, Beth Turner voted to approve the Chatham Park development andContinue Reading

Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 20:56:01 -0400 From: Pat Cabe Subject: “Muddielaces” re Chatham Strong Oh, gag, wretch, and vomit!!! Here we go with another in a growing list of anonymous nay-sayers, willing to diss positions and organizations they disagree with, but unwilling to let Chatlist readers know who theyContinue Reading