On:
In: 27312, Business, Construction, Development, Growth, Pittsboro

Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:59:54 -0500 From: Pittsboro Matters Subject: Chatham Park Construction Jobs? How many jobs and contracts will be set aside for local residents and businesses during the Chatham Park construction process? Unless Chatham Park Investors (AKA Tim Smith and Bubba Rawls) provides a binding answer toContinue Reading

On:
In: 27312, 27344, Development, Growth, Pittsboro, Siler City

Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:06:41 -0500 From: “John R Dykers” Subject: Pittsboro “Nobody goes there anymore; it’s too crowded!” (and Siler City is pushing for a ‘megasite’) Guess the spillover flows west.. It seems to me that folks commenting about new folks moving into the area should indicate whetherContinue Reading

On:
In: 27312, Development, Growth, Musings, Pittsboro, Politics

Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:57:04 -0500 From: samantha capitol Subject: PittsboroMatters: Is it misleading or just wrong? You decide. *Fiction: Pittsboro Matters is a large and diverse group advocating for Pittsboro. Fact: The group is apparently led by a few people who issue talking points. As for demographic diversity…..itContinue Reading

On:
In: 27312, Development, Environment, Growth, Pittsboro, Politics

Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:14:41 -0500 From: samantha capitol Subject: Chatham Park: Does it meet the standards of smart growth? I have continued to do research on Chatham Park, smart growth and development issues in Chatham County and Pittsboro. I found this answer below on the INDY website fromContinue Reading

On:
In: 27312, Construction, Development, Government, Growth, Pittsboro

Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:57:36 -0500 From: Taylor Kish Subject: =?windows-1252?Q?Brad_Page_=96_You_should_know_better=2E?= “The ignorant mind, with its infinite afflictions, passions, and evils, is rooted in the three poisons.  Greed, anger, and delusion.” Preston Development does not have to inform you of exactly what kind of nails they will use, 4”Continue Reading

On:
In: 27312, Construction, Development, Environment, Government, Growth, Pittsboro, Real Estate

Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:25:41 -0600 From: Randolph Voller Subject: Answers for the good questions from Mary Phyllis Horn: Dear Mary Phyllis: I have chatted with you for years, exchanged emails and either read or listened intently to your wisdom and concerns. And you are one of the manyContinue Reading

On:
In: 27312, Development, Growth, Pittsboro, Politics

Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:44:01 -0500 From: Taylor Kish Subject: =?windows-1252?Q?Maryphyllis_96_Merry_Christmas=21?= Someone should have told you.  Your stream of thoughts in your posts to Randy, PBO Commissioners, and “people who favor Chatham Park” are incoherent and incongruous.  You should seek help before you post.  I write this in love.Continue Reading

On:
In: 27312, Business, Construction, Development, Government, Growth, Pittsboro, Politics

Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:07:04 -0500 From: Randolph Voller Subject: Water/Fracking/Concerns The Town of Pittsboro took a leadership role in March of 2012 to take a stand regarding “fracking” and subsequently amended its zoning ordinance to require a special use permit (which requires a quasi-judicial hearing) for any suchContinue Reading

On:
In: 27312, Development, Growth, Pittsboro

Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:40:49 -0500 From: “Tom Glendinning” Subject: Chatham Park Video A year or so ago, Chatham Park Investors published a video on the new development.  It portrays their vision and describes their planning process.  I feel it is worth reviewing at this point in the discussion.Continue Reading

On:
In: 27312, Development, Growth, Pittsboro, Politics

Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:31:31 -0400 From: John Alderman Subject: Chatham Park, All Hands on Deck As a retired NC Wildlife Resources Commission biologist and current small business owner, I know that we can’t rely on state and federal agencies to protect our drinking water supplies.  For example, more thanContinue Reading