Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 22:43:22 -0500 From: “Tom Glendinning” Subject: Debate Plus First, the creek surrounding half of Pittsboro and emptying into Jordan Lake is Robeson Creek. I believe that there are still some Robesons here. Another point I wish to endorse is the debate, subtle or not soContinue Reading
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 19:02:23 -0500 From: samantha capitol Subject: Chatham Park: A new medical center with a hospital.This enhances our access to health care and also equates to more jobs. *Just building the first proposed site for UNC Hospitals will provide jobs in construction, which will focus onContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 06:28:51 -0500 From: Gene Galin Subject: Preston’s developer thinks bigger, proposes new 22,000 home city in Chatham County From the News & Observer – *Preston’s developer thinks bigger, proposes new 22,000 home city in Chatham County* Chatham Park is the brainchild of Tim Smith, oneContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 02:09:23 -0500 From: PBO Guy Subject: How to handle unwanted posts to the Chatlist I posted a comment a couple of days ago about how I think the Chatlist is being over-run by useless posts authored by pseudonym-bearing entities either for or against Chatham ParkContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 21:59:32 -0500 From: Taylor Kish Subject: Ok, I will aim for fairness. . . To be fair, I accept some of those who have signed on with PittsboroMatters feel like they are being Paul(Paulette) Revere; alerting Chatlist Chathamites to the dangers of Preston Development andContinue Reading
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:59:54 -0500 From: Pittsboro Matters Subject: Chatham Park Construction Jobs? How many jobs and contracts will be set aside for local residents and businesses during the Chatham Park construction process? Unless Chatham Park Investors (AKA Tim Smith and Bubba Rawls) provides a binding answer toContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:06:41 -0500 From: “John R Dykers” Subject: Pittsboro “Nobody goes there anymore; it’s too crowded!” (and Siler City is pushing for a ‘megasite’) Guess the spillover flows west.. It seems to me that folks commenting about new folks moving into the area should indicate whetherContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:28:45 -0500 From: “Tom Glendinning” Subject: Another Chatham Park Comment – a matter of principle I think we should issue Parking tickets for those who rehash the same arguments. But in the words of our iconic folk hero, Pete Seegar, “This Land Is Your Land.”Continue Reading
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:14:44 -0500 From: “Tom Glendinning” Subject: Chatham Park Observations Simple and in outline form: 1. The census department forecasts that the population of the county will grow by more than 55,000 to 60,000 people in the next 30 years. If these families buy individual lotsContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:21:33 -0500 From: “John R Dykers” Subject: John Alderman’s Post re Chatham Park. It sounds as though Mr. Alderman, “a professional in this area” should have a face-to-face meeting with Mr. Goodnight and evaluate the plans for Chatham Park with him. He could then tellContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:48:56 -0500 From: Pittsboro Matters Subject: Five Fictions about Chatham Park and Traffic In the most recent chatlist we addressed five of Samatha Capital’s fictions about Chatham Park Investors’ current master plan proposal. Below we address with facts four more fictions that relate to traffic.Continue Reading
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 21:53:53 -0500 From: samantha capitol Subject: Keep it in PBO I have been surfing around the internet and found this face book site called “Keep it in PBO”. Interesting site: https://www.facebook.com/keepitinpbo/posts/1388349031424670?comment_id=20223¬if_t=like I also have followed the HD 54 replacement. It looks like Voller’s friend StarkweatherContinue Reading
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:21:41 -0500 From: “John R Dykers” Subject: We are all “upstream” and “downstream” from each other, even Chatham Park “We know that our air and water supplies are the two most crucial components for life on this planet. They are crucial, ahead of food andContinue Reading
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 07:36:33 -0500 From: J Subject: Re: Chatham Chatlist #4840 On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Chatham Chatlist wrote: > ———————————– > Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 11:55:54 -0500 (EST) > From: mphorn22 > Subject: WVa vs ChathamPark re regulations > > Perhaps mostContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 08:23:52 -0500 From: “Sherri Shepherd Subject: Chatham Park In reply to jforbes about commending those who are against Chatham Park, let it be known that there are those of us who are for Chatham Park who are not in any way affiliated with Preston Developers,Continue Reading
Chatham Chatlist ©2026