Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 16:02:10 -0500 (EST) From: mphorn22 Subject: It only looks that way. Tom, it sounds like you don’t know how activism works. There seldom are large numbers who actually get involved in committees, legwork, etc. The prevailing “hue and cry” I’ve heard from churches, political organizations,Continue Reading
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 00:51:01 -0500 From: Michael Kirkman Subject: Dear Tom West Chatham Chatlist #4869I may or may not agree with the stance of Chatham Matters but I am for a well planned and a successful Ch. Park development. As Tom Glad says we have a 1st amendmentContinue Reading
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 12:50:50 -0500 (EST) From: mphorn22 Subject: Thank you Jody, Jane, Sherri, Taylor, Sonny, Brad Thank you Jody and Sonny and Brad for supporting me in my way of thinking regarding Chatham Park. Jody and Brad, thank you for stating in more detail what you knewContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:30:06 -0500 From: Kira Dirlik Subject: One comment On Dec 17, 2013, at 7:48 AM, Samantha wrote: > Kinda of like the group itself: almost all non-Pittsboro voters who > seek to tell the Town of Pittsboro what to do, while conveniently > ignoring theContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:15:57 -0500 From: Kachergis Subject: Re: not sure what the problem is In response to Tom West’s post on the November 4 Chatlist: I agree with my sister, Anne Kachergis, that here in northeast Chatham, the population is approaching a density that would require someContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:12:06 -0400 From: Robert Sprenger Subject: Future Chatham Park Employment Prospects? I also wonder what sort of employment will develop with the developers developing our previously undeveloped spot on this grand earth.. A few years ago I was tasked with installing the doors on aContinue Reading
Chatham Chatlist ©2024