Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:32:04 -0500 From: Chatham Park Subject: Chatham Park Matters Chatham Park matters to Pittsboro, Chatham County, the Triangle J Region and the State. “Pittsboro” matters greatly, too, which is why the Chatham Park will be built in and around Pittsboro over the next 35 years.Continue Reading
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:42:06 -0500 From: Joe Subject: Brain farts You don’t have to be so hard on yourself Mike. At our age we all have an occasional brain fart. It also seems to be running wild amongs the “Pittsboro Matters” crowd.Continue Reading
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 10:15:51 -0500 From: “John R Dykers” Subject: time of Pittsboro Matters Workshop Dear Mike Watkins, I reread 3 times Amanda Robertson’s initial post about the meeting on 12 Dec looking specifically for the time and it was not in the post anywhere. I almost emailedContinue Reading
ate: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:49:32 -0500 (EST) From: Joe Subject: LOVED suggestion to turn Chatham Park into a ghetto! As a resident of Siler City, I must admit I love D. Sedlak’s suggestion to turn Chatham Park into a 7,100 acres of high-density low-income housing. I am sure theContinue Reading
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:11:03 -0500 From: Tom West Subject: Hate group members to protest at Courthouse on Monday at 6 pm Members of the former Chatham Coaltion hate group (rebranded now as Pittsboro Matters) will be protesting at the Couty Courthouse on Monday at 6 pm. They wantContinue Reading
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:08:43 -0500 From: Tom West Subject: Pittsboro Matters lied that they only learned about Chatham Park recently Stories about the planned Chatham Park started coming out in early 2006. If they can lie about this, what else are they lying about? Should we reward procrastinatorsContinue Reading
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:07:26 -0400 From: Glenn Carter Subject: Chatham Park opponents To Taylor Kish: I saw nowhere the level of vitriol in Ms. Henry’s post compared to yours. I’m convinced that you have some financial or personal connection to this project, am I correct or not? JustContinue Reading
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 23:56:06 -0500 From: Lyle Estill Subject: Chatham Park Movie Tom, When I saw your post I went ahead and re-watched the Chatham Park Movie from a year ago. I would be interested to hear your take on it. Here are some of my impressions: Firstly,Continue Reading
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 22:08:37 +0000 From: Al Cooke Subject: Forestry in Chatham County I did not specifically address any issues of forestry practices in my recent rant about Chatham Park. I do have an article on Chatham County forestry in the current issue of Chatham County Line availableContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:40:49 -0500 From: “Tom Glendinning” Subject: Chatham Park Video A year or so ago, Chatham Park Investors published a video on the new development. It portrays their vision and describes their planning process. I feel it is worth reviewing at this point in the discussion.Continue Reading
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:31:31 -0400 From: John Alderman Subject: Chatham Park, All Hands on Deck As a retired NC Wildlife Resources Commission biologist and current small business owner, I know that we can’t rely on state and federal agencies to protect our drinking water supplies. For example, more thanContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:34:57 -0500 (EST) From: mphorn22 Subject: Re: Al Cooke’s explanations I agree with a lot of Al Cooke’s explanations about Chatham Park. The first of two points I want to bring up is that we the public were not made aware of the looming development beingContinue Reading
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:13:40 -0500 (EST) From: greg6l Subject: Al Cooke’s comment I’d like to personally and publically thank you Mr. Cooke. For those of us who don’t/didn’t know, Mr Cooke took the time to respond to the entire question of Chatham Park. In a few short paragraphsContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 02:33:28 -0500 From: “John R Dykers” Subject: Property Rights/Chatham Park Taylor Kish, Thank you for your kind words in your post 11 Nov. John Locke agrees with you that property rights are “God given” when God gave man dominion over the earth. These rights areContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 12:51:30 -0500 From: “John R Dykers” Subject: Property rights and Chatham Matters and Chatham Park Our property rights are constitutional but not God given. The framers of the constitution included several deists and even a religionist or two depending on interpretations, but all were declaringContinue Reading
Chatham Chatlist ©2026