Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 10:44:01 -0500 From: Taylor Kish Subject: =?windows-1252?Q?Maryphyllis_96_Merry_Christmas=21?= Someone should have told you. Your stream of thoughts in your posts to Randy, PBO Commissioners, and “people who favor Chatham Park” are incoherent and incongruous. You should seek help before you post. I write this in love.Continue Reading
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 08:53:44 -0500 (EST) From: Jane Forbes Subject: re: Chatham development Thank you Brad Page and Maryphyllis! Your comments are so on POINT! Once upon a time, both Cary and Apex were small attractive towns. But no one supervised or limited the growth. Now look –Continue Reading
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:07:04 -0500 From: Randolph Voller Subject: Water/Fracking/Concerns The Town of Pittsboro took a leadership role in March of 2012 to take a stand regarding “fracking” and subsequently amended its zoning ordinance to require a special use permit (which requires a quasi-judicial hearing) for any suchContinue Reading
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:38:25 -0500 From: G > Subject: To Kira Chatlist post 4849 I admit my confusion and limited understanding of your regional dialectic. What exactly are “incomers and profuse breeders?” Am I an incomer because my husband and I work hard, take care of our property,Continue Reading
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:32:54 -0500 (EST) From: Brad Page <bradp24@embarqmail.com> Subject: Re: Samantha Capitol’s “Pittsboro matters to all of us” I do not question the sincerity of Samantha Capitol’s assertion that Pittsboro Matters is not neutral. Far as I can tell no one is neutral who looks atContinue Reading
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:45:13 -0500 From: samantha capitol Subject: Pittsboro matters to all of us. I apologize for my long winded presentation regarding Chatham Park. But the rezoning process and its implications are too complicated to reduce to haiku. Although heavy handed, my point is this: the leadershipContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 17:25:29 -0500 From: carole henry Subject: concerns reply Dear Mr Voller Thank you for your reply on the list about my concerns. Just one question re. water , have you read the little notices that have been sent out about the public water? The waterContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:41:32 -0500 (EST) From: Brad Page Subject: Chatham Park correction In a previous post I referred to the Chatham Park PDD Master Plan as a Project Design Document. I had looked up the term “PDD” for the correct description for this acronym and found 56Continue Reading
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:53:55 -0500 (EST) From: Brad Page Subject: Chatham Park: After PDD approval A reply to Samantha Capitol: “PittsboroMatters leadership: “neutral,” dishonest, or misguided?” Though her somewhat long post goes into considerable detail on the Chatham Park development she leaves one glaring point unaddressed: Why cannotContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:22:07 -0500 From: Chatham Park Subject: Chatham Park: Downtown Pittsboro The community has raised a number of issues during the zoning approval process including downtown revitalization. Chatham Park will support the Main Street program and be a willing partner with downtown businesses and property ownersContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:25:00 -0500 From: Randolph Voller Subject: RE: Pittsboro, mineral rights, fracking, and Pittsboro’s water Dear Chatlist Community: I noticed a post from Ms. Henry yesterday. And I agree with her that water is extremely important; however, the Town of Pittsboro has spent a considerable amountContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:27:01 -0500 From: “John R Dykers” Subject: Development post from Carole Henry “heard an interesting story of a woman who fought a rather large corporation who tried to take away her land to build a big plant and housing development. Her property had been inContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 08:54:04 -0500 From: samantha capitol Subject: PittsboroMatters leadership: “neutral,” dishonest, or misguided? *According to the dictionary the definition of “neutral” is “neither helping or supporting either side in a conflict, disagreement, etc.” Common synonyms are “impartial”, “unbiased” “unprejudiced”, “objective”, “equitable”, “open minded”, “non-partisan”, “disinterested”, “dispassionate”,Continue Reading
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 18:16:06 -0500 From: carole henry Subject: chatham Park I would think that future home buyers looking at home in Chatham Parkshould ask a few questions before buying. Like where is the water coming from. Do they know that Pittsboro water is carcinogenic Would the mineralContinue Reading
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 22:44:36 -0500 From: Randolph Voller Subject: Information on Transportation Plans and Planning Dear Chatham Community: Here is some information from Matthew Day, AICP CTP, who is the Principal Planner for the Triangle Area Rural Planning Organization (TARPO) and Triangle J Council of Governments. ( IContinue Reading
Chatham Chatlist ©2026