Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 13:59:54 -0500 From: Pittsboro Matters Subject: Chatham Park Construction Jobs? How many jobs and contracts will be set aside for local residents and businesses during the Chatham Park construction process? Unless Chatham Park Investors (AKA Tim Smith and Bubba Rawls) provides a binding answer toContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 17:06:41 -0500 From: “John R Dykers” Subject: Pittsboro “Nobody goes there anymore; it’s too crowded!” (and Siler City is pushing for a ‘megasite’) Guess the spillover flows west.. It seems to me that folks commenting about new folks moving into the area should indicate whetherContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:28:45 -0500 From: “Tom Glendinning” Subject: Another Chatham Park Comment – a matter of principle I think we should issue Parking tickets for those who rehash the same arguments. But in the words of our iconic folk hero, Pete Seegar, “This Land Is Your Land.”Continue Reading
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:14:44 -0500 From: “Tom Glendinning” Subject: Chatham Park Observations Simple and in outline form: 1. The census department forecasts that the population of the county will grow by more than 55,000 to 60,000 people in the next 30 years. If these families buy individual lotsContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:21:33 -0500 From: “John R Dykers” Subject: John Alderman’s Post re Chatham Park. It sounds as though Mr. Alderman, “a professional in this area” should have a face-to-face meeting with Mr. Goodnight and evaluate the plans for Chatham Park with him. He could then tellContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:48:56 -0500 From: Pittsboro Matters Subject: Five Fictions about Chatham Park and Traffic In the most recent chatlist we addressed five of Samatha Capital’s fictions about Chatham Park Investors’ current master plan proposal. Below we address with facts four more fictions that relate to traffic.Continue Reading
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:57:04 -0500 From: samantha capitol Subject: PittsboroMatters: Is it misleading or just wrong? You decide. *Fiction: Pittsboro Matters is a large and diverse group advocating for Pittsboro. Fact: The group is apparently led by a few people who issue talking points. As for demographic diversity…..itContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 21:53:53 -0500 From: samantha capitol Subject: Keep it in PBO I have been surfing around the internet and found this face book site called “Keep it in PBO”. Interesting site: https://www.facebook.com/keepitinpbo/posts/1388349031424670?comment_id=20223¬if_t=like I also have followed the HD 54 replacement. It looks like Voller’s friend StarkweatherContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 14:45:56 -0700 From: “Bella Donna Italian Restaurant” Subject: Pittsboro Matters or does it? I could write this anonymously, but I guess I am braver than those other anonymous writers or maybe just plain ignorant. This may hurt my business but at this point, I don’tContinue Reading
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2014 16:19:19 -0500 From: “connectnc.net Subject: to park or not to park I have kept mostly quiet about the Chatham park issue . Its clear there are strong arguments on both sides . My question is why build 20,000 homes when we have unfinished developments withContinue Reading
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 15:08:41 -0500 From: Taylor Kish Subject: Thank you, John Alderman’s family! Truly, John Alderman, I appreciate your relatives’ service to our country and the cause of freedom and liberty around the world. They have my undying gratitude. Enough said. I do not appreciate the peopleContinue Reading
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 12:52:13 -0500 From: “John R Dykers” Subject: Chatham Park Construction Jobs? Pittsboro Matters raises legitimate concerns. Contracts will be let by “Chatham Park Investors (AKA Tim Smith and Bubba Rawls)” based on the vendors capacity to perform the service, personal relationships/knowledge of prior performance, andContinue Reading
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 08:18:01 -0800 (PST) From: megan lynch Subject: Public parks and public access on the Haw River I would like to correct some mis-information I read on the Chatlist. ( see below my entry for the original) The Haw River is blessed with acres of publicContinue Reading
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:20:41 -0500 From: PBO Guy Subject: Chatlist 4863 I notice that the Chatlist is becoming dominated by posts from a few ‘anonymous’ posters yammering on about their political position on the Goodnight/Preston Development/Chatham Park subject. Perhaps they can start their own discussion group, or takeContinue Reading
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 09:55:57 -0500 (EST) From: Brad Page Subject: Samantha Capitol and Taylor Kish So, we’re now facing the double-team of two fictional personnas from the Chatham Park public relations department. Fascinating. Mr. or Ms. Kish’s typical and personal attack on John Alderman following that gentleman’s measuredContinue Reading
Chatham Chatlist ©2026