Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:32:54 -0500 (EST) From: Brad Page <> Subject: Re: Samantha Capitol’s “Pittsboro matters to all of us” I do not question the sincerity of Samantha Capitol’s assertion that Pittsboro Matters is not neutral. Far as I can tell no one is neutral who looks atContinue Reading
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:45:13 -0500 From: samantha capitol Subject: Pittsboro matters to all of us. I apologize for my long winded presentation regarding Chatham Park. But the rezoning process and its implications are too complicated to reduce to haiku. Although heavy handed, my point is this: the leadershipContinue Reading
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 12:10:02 -0500 From: Darryl Wally Subject: Re: Chatham Chatlist #4849 On Dec 18, 2013, at 8:05 AM, Chatham Chatlist wrote: > Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:30:06 -0500 > From: Kira Dirlik > Subject: One comment > > > On Dec 17, 2013, at 7:48Continue Reading
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 17:25:29 -0500 From: carole henry Subject: concerns reply Dear Mr Voller Thank you for your reply on the list about my concerns. Just one question re. water , have you read the little notices that have been sent out about the public water? The waterContinue Reading
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 10:41:32 -0500 (EST) From: Brad Page Subject: Chatham Park correction In a previous post I referred to the Chatham Park PDD Master Plan as a Project Design Document. I had looked up the term “PDD” for the correct description for this acronym and found 56Continue Reading
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 09:53:55 -0500 (EST) From: Brad Page Subject: Chatham Park: After PDD approval A reply to Samantha Capitol: “PittsboroMatters leadership: “neutral,” dishonest, or misguided?” Though her somewhat long post goes into considerable detail on the Chatham Park development she leaves one glaring point unaddressed: Why cannotContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:22:07 -0500 From: Chatham Park Subject: Chatham Park: Downtown Pittsboro The community has raised a number of issues during the zoning approval process including downtown revitalization. Chatham Park will support the Main Street program and be a willing partner with downtown businesses and property ownersContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 11:25:00 -0500 From: Randolph Voller Subject: RE: Pittsboro, mineral rights, fracking, and Pittsboro’s water Dear Chatlist Community: I noticed a post from Ms. Henry yesterday. And I agree with her that water is extremely important; however, the Town of Pittsboro has spent a considerable amountContinue Reading
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:27:01 -0500 From: “John R Dykers” Subject: Development post from Carole Henry “heard an interesting story of a woman who fought a rather large corporation who tried to take away her land to build a big plant and housing development. Her property had been inContinue Reading
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 18:16:06 -0500 From: carole henry Subject: chatham Park I would think that future home buyers looking at home in Chatham Parkshould ask a few questions before buying. Like where is the water coming from. Do they know that Pittsboro water is carcinogenic Would the mineralContinue Reading
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:32:04 -0500 From: Chatham Park Subject: Chatham Park Matters Chatham Park matters to Pittsboro, Chatham County, the Triangle J Region and the State. “Pittsboro” matters greatly, too, which is why the Chatham Park will be built in and around Pittsboro over the next 35 years.Continue Reading
ate: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 07:49:32 -0500 (EST) From: Joe Subject: LOVED suggestion to turn Chatham Park into a ghetto! As a resident of Siler City, I must admit I love D. Sedlak’s suggestion to turn Chatham Park into a 7,100 acres of high-density low-income housing. I am sure theContinue Reading
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:11:03 -0500 From: Tom West Subject: Hate group members to protest at Courthouse on Monday at 6 pm Members of the former Chatham Coaltion hate group (rebranded now as Pittsboro Matters) will be protesting at the Couty Courthouse on Monday at 6 pm. They wantContinue Reading
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 22:08:43 -0500 From: Tom West Subject: Pittsboro Matters lied that they only learned about Chatham Park recently Stories about the planned Chatham Park started coming out in early 2006. If they can lie about this, what else are they lying about? Should we reward procrastinatorsContinue Reading
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:07:26 -0400 From: Glenn Carter Subject: Chatham Park opponents To Taylor Kish: I saw nowhere the level of vitriol in Ms. Henry’s post compared to yours. I’m convinced that you have some financial or personal connection to this project, am I correct or not? JustContinue Reading
Chatham Chatlist ©2024