Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 14:32:04 -0500 From: madkrowt Subject: For just 5 bucks… Ms Robertson says “I have pussy hats”. Must be a demoncrat. sounds like Chicago Rahm saying to never pass up a chance to “use an opportunity created by a tragedy” or something to that effect. For justContinue Reading

Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 23:03:43 -0500 From: “Tom Glendinning” Subject: sine ecclesiam Dei I am so relieved that the priestess of All That Is Right With The Left, has absolved any liberals, leftists, socialists, or other for attacking Goodnight Mark for his views. Thus is the self absorbed universeContinue Reading

Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 13:24:27 -0500 From: “John Dykers M.D.” Subject: Issues and endorsements Mary Alexion is correct, of course, wanting to know what a candidate thinks about relevant issues.  Her post on Sunday. However, it is near impossible to know all the nuances, and we may know someoneContinue Reading

Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 13:09:49 -0400 From: mphorn22 aol.com Subject: Goodnight Mark I’m so sorry that happened to you, Mark, in regard to liberal politicians.  Some of what you experienced about going up against them is what liberal voters have experienced when going up against conservative politicians.  In our county,Continue Reading

Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 10:47:32 -0400 From: mphorn22 aol.com Subject: Brad and Taylor Kish Hurray, Brad! What a wonderful retort to Taylor Kish’s usual manner.  Thank you for your succinct and erudite response. I find it interesting that Kish posts usually around election times, be they November’s or in primaries. Continue Reading

Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 23:49:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Todd Adams Subject: Re: Chatham Chatlist #5782 I read the responses to Mr. Kish.   I don’t agree with labelling people, and the language used often comes to those who reject the existence of the Holocaust, something much more easy toContinue Reading

Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 13:41:25 -0500 From: Gina Robertson Subject: Climate change It is not unreasonable to consider “scientific consensus” today to be something more reliable than what it was in 1543.   Also, I imagine there was more scientific doubt about the earth-centric scientific consensus at that timeContinue Reading

Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 11:30:01 -0500 From: “Constance Keptic” Subject: Pat Cabe and Pascal’s Wager Fundamentally what Pat Cabe is saying is it doesn’t matter whether climate change is a real phenomenon or, if it is, whether human activity contributes to it. If we act as if both thoseContinue Reading